HobbyFarms.com


Your E-mail:
Hobby Farms - Current Issue
Hobby Farm Home Magazine
Urban Farm Magazine

Printer Friendly

More Questions Than Answers

USDA’s NAIS listening session in Louisville draws protest, calls for change

05/27/2009

By Lisa Munniksma, HF managing editor

How the NAIS affect small farmers
Will NAIS become mandatory?
USDA’s National Animal Identification System has been plagued by controversy since its initial implementation as a voluntary program in 2004.
More Chances to Be Heard
Also during the listening session in Louisville, USDA representatives announced six additional listening sessions across the country. Remaining listening sessions are:
  • Jefferson City, Mo.: June 9
  • Rapid City, S.D.: June 11
  • Albuquerque, N.M.: June 16
  • Riverside, Calif.: June 18
  • Raleigh, N.C.: June 25
  • Jasper, Fl.: June 27


With secretary of agriculture Tom Vilsack’s call for a mandatory-participation program earlier this year, farmers and consumers became more vocal about their wishes and concerns with NAIS.

Listening sessions arranged around the country by USDA this spring are designed to collect feedback, brainstorm solutions and draw on the agriculture community’s collective ideas to put a national ID program in place.

Participants at the listening session
Photos by Lisa Munniksma

More than 100 people attended the NAIS Listening session in Louisville, Ky.

Approximately 100 people were in attendance at the Louisville, Ky., listening session on May 22. In the morning meeting, six people who spoke were representing groups that were in favor of a national ID program and approximately 30 were opposed to a new tracking system.

More questions were raised than solutions proposed by either side. One area that appeared to be frustrating to those in attendance was that while USDA representatives were present, no spokesperson was there to clear up misconceptions and answer questions directly.

Debate and Discussion
Attendees were given three minutes to speak during the morning meeting. In the afternoon, the attendees were broken into three groups and permitted to speak for as long as they wished, which encouraged dialog and better understanding from both sides of the issue.

All comments were recorded and will be analyzed by the NAIS staff.

More Comments Welcome
In addition to the taped feedback from these listening sessions, USDA is welcoming written comments, which can be submitted online or here.

Send comments by mail to:

ATTN NAIS
Surveillance and Identification Programs
National Center for Animal Health Programs
VS, APHIS
4700 River Rd., Unit 200
Riverdale, MD 20737

A group from the Community Farm Alliance spoke and protested during the NAIS listening
A group from the Community Farm Alliance spoke and protested during the NAIS listening session in Louisville.

“I personally assure you that every written comment will be read and considered before we move forward,” said Dr. Ulysses Lane of USDA’s Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service. “At the end of the [listening session], we want to learn what program options you will support so we can pass that on to secretary Vilsack.”

Speaking Up in Louisville
Those speaking against NAIS were largely from the small-farm community surrounding Louisville.

“The extra burden of NAIS at this point in time would destroy many family farms,” said Dawn Oaks, who was in attendance for her husband, a farmer who couldn’t attend because he was taking advantage of the much-needed dry weather for planting.

“You need to go where the [animal health] problem is, which is not on small, family farms,” said Ben Secaur, a pastor and start-up farmer.

Those in favor of NAIS pointed to the need for a tracking system in the event of an animal-disease outbreak.

Wendell Berry spoke at the USDA NAIS Listening Session in May 2009
Kentucky farmer and noted author Wendell Berry said it's important to beat the initiative in order to "maintain some kind of basis of small farmers in this country.”

“We think the small farms will lose just as much as the big farms with an outbreak of animal disease. This is different than food safety,” said Dennis Liptrap, a hog farmer who was representing the Kentucky Pork Producers Association at the meeting.

Even pro-NAIS attendees stated concerns with the program as it stands, however.

Speakers on both sides of the issue commented on NAIS’s questionable role in food safety, although the USDA representatives in attendance stated that an animal-tracking system isn’t designed to be a food-safety measure, rather one designed to minimize damage to the nation’s livestock in the event of a disease outbreak.

The need for a more streamlined system was pointed out time and again, as well. As NAIS stands currently, confinement-operation-housed hogs and poultry, for example, aren’t required to be individually identified, rather they can receive one number for the group as long as they are raised and transported in that same group; whereas hogs and chickens housed in pasture-based systems must each have their own ID number—a discrepancy that appears unfair to farmers.

Community Farm Alliance Media Event
During the lunch break, the Community Farm Alliance, a 2,000-member small-farm coalition based in central Kentucky, held a press conference in the parking lot of the meeting site to draw attention to their concerns with NAIS.

Noted author Wendell Berry, a Henry County, Ky., native, spoke adamantly regarding his feelings on NAIS: “It’s really important that we beat this initiative with NAIS because … it’s really important that we maintain some kind of basis of small farmers in this country.”

Approximately 60 people attended in support of an NAIS protest, and speakers included Berry, CFA president Adam Barr and Liberty Ark Coalition co-founder Karin Bergener. This was the first press conference of the sort to be held at a USDA listening session, and police were on hand but weren’t needed.

Transcripts of the NAIS listening sessions will be posted online.

 Give us your opinion on
More Questions Than Answers

Submit a Comment
Reader Comments
I don't like mandatory.
Galadriel, Lothlorien, ME
Posted: 8/19/2010 11:42:56 PM
Our government is really good at coming up with plans that cost a lot of money and are never truly implemented for the benefit of the people. They are really good at making the money for these programs disappear into the right pockets then fail at everything else. We HAVE programs that should be preventing these issues but they don't want to pay for inspectors and the testing that needs to be done. As it is, most processing houses are only inspected a couple times a year. How long will it be til the so called protections of this plan are gone by the wayside but the farmers will still be required to pay for them? Stop selling our food to other countries, stop importing foods taht are not inspected and safe and stop filling our foods full of chemicals and crap to keep them on the shelf longer. Then 99% of these concerns will be gone.
Laura, Athens, OH
Posted: 5/23/2010 5:28:40 AM
This would be a no win program.Everybody loses in the end.The gov.could not mantain control of all the livestock in this nation,theres just no way.
Bobby, Elkhart, TX
Posted: 3/9/2010 8:50:29 PM
We need to stop NAIS now.. How can we do that.. If these becames law.. What next.. Barcoding or micro-chipping people..

Stop this now before we have no rights.
Sunny, Brookings, OR
Posted: 8/27/2009 12:50:44 PM
View Current Comments

Name:
Address:
City:
State:
Zip Code:
Email:

Product Spotlight
>
Hobby Farm Rewards 
Member Login »

facebook


Information on over 200 horse breeds