Pros & Cons Of Manual Vs. Gas-Powered Post Drivers

There are two main types of standalone post drivers on the market: manual drivers and gas-powered models. Both designs are useful for different purposes.

article-post
by J. Keeler Johnson
PHOTO: J. Keeler Johnson

There are so many ways to use T-posts (and other reusable metal posts) on farms. Whether you’re putting up fencing, staking a fruit tree or just marking a rock in a field, T-posts are a handy asset no farmer should be without. Of course, T-posts aren’t very useful unless you have a way to install them. That’s where post drivers come into play.

There are two main types of standalone post drivers on the market: manual drivers and gas-powered models. Manual drivers rely on your muscles and their own weight to install posts in the ground. Gas-powered drivers, on the other hand, typically employ 2-stroke or 4-stroke engines to pound posts into place with thousands of strikes per minute.

Both designs are useful for different purposes, so let’s explore some of the pros and cons offered by each.


Read more: T-posts are some of the most versatile tools on any farm.


Manual Post Driver

Pros

Certainly the biggest advantage of a manual post driver is its simplicity. There are no moving parts, nothing that requires maintenance or fuel—it’s just a solid piece of steel. You lift it up, you drive it downward onto a post, and the post inches its way into the ground.

Repeat the process until the post has reached the correct depth, and you’re good to go.

Subscribe now

This simplicity means manual post drivers are perfect for tossing into the back of a wagon for hauling around whenever and wherever you might need one. Aside from a little rust in the long term, they won’t suffer for living an outdoor life.

Manual post drivers are also lightweight compared to gas-powered drivers (generally coming in between 10 and 30 points), and because they’re simple, they’re less expensive too. You might be able to find a smaller one for $20 or so.

Cons

Manual post drivers can be tiring to use for extended periods of time because you must lift and thrust down the driver five, eight or 10 times per post (maybe more), depending on the size of the post and the conditions of the ground.

For driving the occasional post, this isn’t a problem, but if you’re installing dozens for a fencing project, you’ll eventually wear yourself out. This goes double if you’re installing large-diameter posts in hard ground with a driver weighing ~30 pounds or so.


Read more: A wagon full of tools can save you time and energy on farm tasks.


Gas-powered Post Driver

Pros

A gas-powered post driver does most of the work for you! There isn’t much muscle power required.

You simply hoist the driver on top of the stake and push the trigger, prompting the driver to rapidly pound the post into place. Gas-powered post drivers are particularly helpful for installing large posts (3-4 inches in diameter) or dozens of posts all at once.

Such projects can be exhausting with a manual driver, so a gas-powered model will save you a lot of effort. Just as importantly, vibration-absorbing designs reduce the pounding felt by the user.

Cons

Gas-powered post drivers are heavier than manual drivers, often tipping the scales between 30 and 45 pounds. This makes them a little less convenient to carry around.

They require routine maintenance just like any other tool with a small engine, and they’re considerably more expensive than manual drivers, costing hundreds or even thousands of dollars.

Of course, you don’t necessarily have to choose one over the other. If you’re frequently installing large posts and know a gas-powered model will save you a lot of time and effort, by all means make the investment.

But if the simplicity and convenience of a manual post driver sounds appealing for quick jobs, why not add one to your arsenal? They’re not very expensive, and sometimes having both types is the perfect recipe for maximum productivity.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

CAPTCHA Image